The 9/11 Pentagon Conspiracy ... or not
This may be old news for some, but there is rather damning evidence showing that the Flight 77 - the jumbo alleged to have crashed into the Pentagon on 9-11 - did not actually crash inot the building.
Quote from 9-11 reearch site: "Because of the absence of public evidence proving that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and the documented lack of damage to the building and lack of debris commensurate with the crash of such a large aircraft, among other things, speculation has flourished about what really hit the pentagon on September 11th."
The evidence pointing to a cover up does seem credible, although there is no doubt the Penatgon was attacked - 125 people died in the attack.
This raises some intersting questions - If there was a cover-up, why? Did the Pentagon not want to admit that it was vulnerable to a missile attack - which seems the most likely event taking into consideration the structural damage and the handful of images that have been released to the public. All other video and photographic media of the event has been confiscted and remains classified.
And if Flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon what happened to it? Was it sot down? Surely the debris would have been found where it came down.
Why is the US governemt covering up this attack when it now seems quite plainly obvious, with the accumulated evidence (and withholding of evidence - perhaps the biggest indeicator of something amiss) that Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon?
What are they hiding? If tehy are now hiding behind what is now quite plainly a false story of the event, it makes yo wonder howm many other fabrications they are spewing out!
